Can Alternative Medicine Cure Cancer?

Can Alternative Medicine Cure Cancer?

young boy by the name of daniel hauser
and he’s thirty years old and unfortunately
he has hodgkin’s lymphoma lymphoma sorry and uh… heat actually tried chemotherapy back in
february and uh… it worked it reduce the size
is too much end it by doctors say that too with the kind of cancer the daniel has
he is up to a ninety percent chance of being feared within a fair bit so at this point the stories normal in
fine uh… here’s where it takes a turn then
his parents decided you know what we don’t want it in a fair people were
part of mendenhall band which is apparently and native american group that believes that you can do cure
people through burbs and natural remedies and so they started uh… stock to
chemotherapy is started while being down with uh… herbs as
such just what happened shockingly enough that didn’t work and his tumor growth and now it’s to the point where they had to go to good judge the people
are still single disk it’s gonna die and his chances of recovering without
chemotherapy is five percent so because it came only as a ninety
percent chance of surviving if he doesn’t do it is a ninety five percent
chance of dying but uh… families is not at all we’ve
got our cultural or religious beliefs and you can argue with that more
positive use that for a reason to work by the way had just in case you if
you’re wondering if this is some you know cultura believes not really
namin ha was founded in the nineteen nineties by phillip cloud pile or lenders whose once served four months in prison
in idaho for fraud related to advocating natural
remedies so the judge has stepped in and said look here’s the bottom line yet till tuesday potatoes x_-rays and going on colleges conservative again uh… allies renewal form and gayab family rights cultural rights
religious rights arctic it somewhere else thomas edison’s life and are those on hike cannot agree more with the job it’s one thing to say hey you know what
my dad natural remedies that i wanna rob on my ass and a little work in a to be
fantastic anyone do that on top of the chemo or you don’t have to answer you got a call
when you think they know what was the weapon a deal with it goblets gulfport there but i’m not being judgmental well no i am be different but i must say that i don’t believe in
any right i do think that stupid airborne when i
think i would get sick and you know what happiness myself
psychologically that works entitled soap toby roth i’m not against natural
remedies i’m not against trying analogous having on the side you can’t do it as opposed to chemotherapy well we know
the science is a in this case if he will say this light an actual uh… revenues would in fact we are
needed to do is go out and said that that people with these kind of elites
are drive me crazy but it’s a free country you’re allowed to your own opinions when you’re not allowed to have is your
own facts servo you can come here and tell me even
evan ha founder decided in the nineteen nineties but this was a better way to go and that interestingly it’s the same but not a big fan of the religious beliefs their tromping site in
the first place but especially when it is alive someone
up by the way they say on our own this you know if it is a very
mature thirty wrote it he’s already in medicine men in our
culture and considered an elder the kid as a learning disabilities he
doesn’t know what a medicine men s he can’t even read it’s absolutely no it was interesting

100 Replies to “Can Alternative Medicine Cure Cancer?”

  1. @fcdog555, ok, you want to start a debate on it, the first thing I'd like you to do is to give me PROOF, that's right, I want you to come up with a study that proves outright that chemotherapy drugs are proven against cancer in the 'Vast majority of cases'.

    I'll be here waiting while you look it up. Do bear in mind, however, that the largest study done in history was unable to prove such a thing. But, please, bring me the proof!

  2. I am astonished by yr reply re immune system – its the MAJOR defense system.

    In a 2005 study, researchers at UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center were able to observe – in real time – how the immune system initially recognizes cancer & mobilizes to fight it.

    "The study is expected to lead to new ways to test immune-based therapies for cancer and other immune system-related diseases" said Dr. Owen Witte, Jonsson Cancer Centre researcher & professor of microbiology, immunology & molecular genetics.

  3. @fcdog555, your blind faith in the 'people of medicine' is touching, but quite dangerous. You do realize that 'people of medicine' have given out literally thousands of drugs that have killed or led to serious disabilities. Your claims are therefore false, people of medicine do in fact, give out medicine that is not only not proven to be helpful but is downright dangerous. Thalidomide, VIOXX which doubled the risk of heart attacks and hundreds of drugs recalled every year.

  4. @jtking2504 Nope, you are plainly wrong.
    I am a scientist and I know people in the medical field (which I doubt is the case for you).
    Not a single doctor will give medicine out that will merely harm them.
    Yes they will give medicine out that has risks, but guess what, they tell the patients the risks and let them decide.
    I'm sorry, but you need to get more familiar with science before you call someone ignorant on the subject,
    Ignorance of ignorance is by far more dangerous.

  5. @jtking2504 Okay, posted on pub med, July 14, 2011 "Treatment Strategies in Patients with Core-Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia"
    "Long-term RFS (relapse-free survival) is reported among 40-60%."
    There, I just proved you wrong and not with just a research paper, but a research paper post yesterday.
    you fail

  6. @fcdog555, mate, when you can't counter an argument you STFU! Sending me empty statements, you keep digging yourself into a bigger hole. I will take your utter inability to prove your statement, that I am completely correct, we both know it's never been proven in the 'vast majority of cases' so you can't prove it, but you're not gracious enough to accept that. You're just a silly kid, shooting your comments off without knowledge and for that reason, I will not give you the time of day again.

  7. @fcdog555, that's a goood one, a scientist of trolling, you're too funny.

    Now you've taken to strawman arguments, making up you're own arguments and then countering them – you can't counter my arguments so you have to make them up! Not at any point did I say that Drs give them out to 'merely harm them', do you think they told the mothers taking thalidomide for morning sickness that their babies would be deformed?

    Let me guess, are you bored with nothing to do? Gameboy broken junior?

  8. @jtking2504 Here is what I said "Not a single doctor will give medicine out that will merely harm them"
    This is what you said "did I say that Drs give them out to 'merely harm them',"
    See where you failed?
    And it is not a strawman, I was telling you why your argument is false based on the fact that doctors won't give medicine out that merely hurts people. Where you said "people of medicine do in fact, give out medicine that is not only not proven to be helpful but is downright dangerous" fail

  9. @fcdog555, and that wasn't the ORIGINAL argument made, which you did not address = strawman. Mate, you're so outed, it's over. You should probably get that Gameboy fixed and find something better to do than trolling. I have to admire your efforts though. Have a great day.

  10. @jtking2504 haha clearly you don't know what a strawman argument is then.
    I like how you didn't address your mistake about misquoting me nor did you address my statement on doctors.
    If failing was taxed, you'd be in quite the debt good sir.

  11. @fcdog555, it doesn't work when your opponent already knows you're a troll.

    I think ebay have some good prices on a new Gameboy though 🙂

  12. @jtking2504 didn't know losing consisted of me referring you to a published med article that showed chemo worked lolz

  13. @arsenalmanic Can you give me a guarantee that the chemo theaphy will work?
    From what I have learned, your body is pretty much aple to cure any disease. Its just about what you eat and drink. There are so many alternative forms of cancer cures, but they are all about a healthy lifestyle.

  14. I think we people tend to get sick with cancer and other diseases becourse something is not in balance in our body and that problem can only be taking care of if we stop drinking and smoking and eating all theese addictives the food indusrty puts in our food and drinking products (And polution of course). Try to look up the gearson theaphy here on youtube, maybe that will open your mind a bit regarding alternative healing.

  15. But that's just one out of many. I saw a program today about alternative cures in india, called Ayurveda. Look up this link aswell, i think the person who made this proberly is right about theese things from what i have studied. The medicine industry is a money making machine, just remember that. I hope your family member will get well again. Best Regards

  16. @jtking2504
    You couldn't be more wrong,or at least ill informed. Chemo therapy is not a panacea to all cancers since all cancers are very different and there is no such thing as a cure for "cancer". Its only used for specific cancers where the efficacy is high,but is not used at all in other types of cancers where it is non existent,like pancreatic. Chemo is very effective in this childs case because of A. its progression and B. The type of cancer he has,for the very side effect you cite.

  17. @SkepticalAaron, YOU couldn't be more wrong, or at least ill informed! Go away and do some reading on subjects before you comment, let alone blatantly call someone else wrong. I'm not here to do the work for you. Chemo is used widely for cancers that it has no efficacy for, go find out about the biggest study ever done. Giving toxic chemicals that destroy the only thing a sick person has, immune system, knowing it does not 'cure', mate, if that makes sense to you, go ahead and take the stuff!

  18. Studies by Dr Ulrich Abel show "there is no evidence for the vast majority of cancers that treatment with these drugs exerts any positive influence on survival or quality of life in patients with advanced disease." The "almost dogmatic belief in the efficacy of chemo" is "based on false conclusions from inappropriate data." "The personal views of most oncologists seem to be in striking contrast to communications to the public." He found most oncologists would not take chemo if they had cancer.

  19. @jtking2504
    I'm very well read in oncology while you seem to have only googled "chemo doesn't work" and read some shitty pop media article or off some alt med site. And obviously you didn't even read what I wrote. I'll say it again,Chemo is a treatment,not a "cure" and is not presented as a "cure". Cancer is a blanket term,there is no one size fits all for cancer treatment and sometimes there is no advantage to chemo in some TYPES and STAGES. cont…

  20. Chemo is used very little or not at all in some cancers. When my mother had pancreatic cancer she received NO chemo therapy as there is no survival rate difference in that type between chemo or no chemo. You keep talking about the immune system being the only thing they have,but if you knew anything about the immune response to cancer then you would know that the immune system is of little help since the biology of cancers make it difficult to detect or get a rigorous immune response. cont…

  21. In this boys case,he has Hodgkins, which means he has abnormal growth of B Cells are part of you immune system that fights infections,and if it is allowed to grow will shut down your immune system. So you don't think he should get chemo because it effects the immune system,but the ironic part is it's part of his immune system that's killing him and destroying itself. So that fact that chemo inhibits the immune system is a plus in his case.

  22. @SkepticalAaron, a weakened immune system is actually a known risk for Hodgkins! It's part of the cause, so weakening it even further with toxic chemicals, just can't say I agree with you on that one.

  23. @jtking2504 Right,now I definitely know you got your info from alt med sites and not because you did real research and read the paper. Also,you've combined a different claim made by alt meders and incorrectly attributed it to Ulrich. 1.The Ulrich quotes are a quote mine and they try to then use that to mean he thinks chemo doesn't work at all and its a sham. Wrong. He dicussed only late stage treatment and not all phases of treatment which is a very important distinction…cont…

  24. @SkepticalAaron 2. If you read Ulrich's publishing history which mostly has to do with specific types of cancer and specific treament options,you see that he does find great efficacy with many chemo treatments in specific cancers,which is exactly what I said.So if you're going to cite him as someone shedding light on the scam of chemo,then you should actually read his papers and not quote mine a couple sentences from one paper.

  25. @jtking2504 3. The claim that "most oncologists would not take chemo" is another dishonestly described, cherry picked survey used by alt meders. The survey from 1985 was about ONE specific type of lung cancer and ONE specific EXPIREMENTAL drug that was in trials,not as a whole or cancer in general. How unsurprising that they wouldn't take a new experimental therapy that was still in trial. I'm astonished! The ultimate outcome was it didn't work for that specific type and isn't used for that….

  26. @SkepticalAaron, none of what you've written on here is actually true at all! I don't think you're looking at the same study, because Ulrich actually studied an extremely wide range of cancers, I have no idea where you got the notion that he only studies lung cancer, that's just not true. In fact, the entire point of his research was to study the various different types of cancer to see which ones chemo may have had any efficacy for. This was the point of it, his findings……

  27. @SkepticalAaron, I am astonished by yr reply re immune system – its the MAJOR defense system.

    In a 2005 study, researchers at UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center observed- how the immune system recognizes cancer & mobilizes to fight it.

    "The study is expected to lead to new ways to test immune-based therapies for cancer and other immune system-related diseases" said Dr. Owen Witte, Jonsson Cancer Centre researcher & professor of microbiology, immunology & molecular genetics.

    You have 1 way

  28. @jtking2504, to be honest, I haven't got any more time to spend on this. I simply do not agree with your thinking on it, I have also had many, many years of research and study, decades in fact. I strongly disagree with the use of toxic chemicals to try to 'treat' cancer, I simply do not agree because I have done quality research & there is much ignorance in conventional 'chemo' I'm not really interested in getting into a big, drawn out debate on here, I've said as much as I have time to say.

  29. @48snowbird Natural cures are bullshit!!! THERE IS NO CURE FOR CANCER!!! Just effective Scientifically porven treatments!!! Quit being irresponsible & spreading this false hope to people who could get Scientifically proven efficacious treatments that could save their lives!!! Alternative Medicine should be held to the same standard as Western Medicine which is to prove it, just prove it that's all!!! And when I say prove it I mean prove it Scientifically not with bullshit anecdotal evidence!!!

  30. @narutofortevile First of all you need to learn how to spell dumb ass!!! It's Chemo not Chymo!!! And the only bullshit is that your better off with alternative medicine than Scientifically proven methods to treat cancer when it's just not true. Look at the facts people die all the time because they search for a non toxic treatment for their cancer and by the time they realize it doesn't work it's to late for the Doctors to save their lives!!! Do your home work and look at the facts not hype!!!

  31. @Heisi58008 Prove it!!! You say "it has been proven to be very effective" prove it!!! Prove it Scientifically not with anecdotal evidence which can never be considered Scientific!!! Don't you think that if there was a conspiracy by the government to squash a cure that they could easily do that without your dumb ass knowing about it? How can the government control all kinds of filo viruses in there possession & not control a cancer cure? I'm sorry but there's just not a conspiracy like you think.

  32. @jtking2504 You haven't said shit if you can't prove it! Are you Scientist or Doctor? Why do Naturopaths always shy away from Scientific proof!!! Chemotherapy has changed significantly over the past thirty years & is far less toxic than it used to be, in fact the Block Center which is an integrated medicine cancer clinic has very little toxicity with their patients on chemo, they don't even loose their hair but they still use SCIENTIFICALLY proven treatments not bullshit natural cures wake up!!!

  33. @SkepticalAaron Thank You! I'm so sick of these Naturopaths that don't deal in facts!!! It's refreshing to see other people that trust Science not anecdotal evidence which can never be trusted. I also can't believe that they all think the Doctors are in on some kind of conspiracy. This is utterly ridiculous & virtually impossible to keep a lid on. It's one thing to not trust pharmaceutical companies or the FDA but to say that doctors are in on it is ridiculous. Science is our only hope!!!

  34. @Conquistador2112 Hey dirt bag, first off this was written by my sister who has a brain tumor she's had surgery and alliterative medicines. It has taken her five years to get to the point of writing, using the computer and typing. They offered her chemo in ass-backwards Idaho. The doctors in Portland OR. and California said chemo would had ruined her for life.

    P.S. This comment was posted 6 months ago wtf man or old woman!

  35. @Conquistador2112, there is no scientific proof that poison cures most cancers, you would have to come up with a body of research that proves a cure (not just shrinking a tumor temporarily using poison). Natural therapy restores the body's ability to self heal but if you prefer toxic chemicals, be my guest. We all make our own choices and I wouldn't go near chemo & destroy my immune system, that's the most 'bullshit cure' there is, I dont buy it. But you can.

  36. @Heisi58008, totally agree! The public are waking up to this profit making business, it is a conflict of interest, the illness & death industry (aka Big Pharma) make much more if you gradually get sicker thinking you need more of their poison. More people die of chemo than cancer.

  37. @narutofortevile I had no way of knowing that about your sister? She shouldn't make comments comparing the use of chemo with Nazis. Brain tumors are different than many other cancers because they are harder to treat if not impossible. I don't have a problem with people doing integrated medicine when good treatment options are not available. If what you say about your sister is true & I somehow hurt her feelings I apologize & wish her luck with her treatment. Check the Block Center in Illinois.

  38. @jtking2504 THERE IS SCIENTIFIC PROOF YOU IDIOT!!! Millions of people successfully treated Science Journals, clinical trials, peer review etc. How the hell can you say that there's no Scientific evidence in Western Medicine when it's all about Science you Moron!!! Depending on the type of cancer you have & when they detect it cancer can be very effectively treated now. THERE IS NO CURE FOR CANCER!!! Just very effective treatments but you won't find any of them in natural medicine you idiot!!!

  39. @jtking2504 It's funny people like you would be begging to go to a hospital if you were about to bleed to death or loose a limb from an accident yet you want to demonize western medicine!!! I admit the system isn't perfect & I hope I never have to take chemo but if I had to in order to save my life you can bet I would have better results using science based treatments than a bunch of bullshit you find in so called "Alternative Medicine" bottom line, you naturopaths still can't prove jack shit!!!

  40. @jtking2504 I'm a TROLL because I'm trying to be voice of reason to people looking for alternatives that don't exist but you, you're not a TROLL for going around perpetuating this bullshit!!! What a fucking hypocrite, you're an idiot!!! You should find something better to do like Scientific research on cancer & actual efficacious cancer treatments then maybe you would see that these natural cures are a bunch of bullshit, if it were that easy there's no way pharma could keep a lid on it. Idiot!!!

  41. Look up Gerson Therapy / Gerson Diet. Lots of testimonials, here on youtube too. They also go into what they believe causes cancer to begin with — mostly diet and environment. It is "natural", but it's also intense.

    If you look into at how drug companies lie with statistics, cancer meds do NOT have that great of a track record. Do reasearch.

  42. @Heisi58008"There are many many natural remedies (such as THC) which have proven very effective in cancer treatment"

    Bull shit! What proof? There is NO proof that ANY of these natural remedies (THC) are effective against cancer.Just Joe Blow saying he was cured!I'm so sick of you alt. med. naturapaths etc. saying there are EFFECTIVE cheap natural cures for cancer.If that crap really worked don't you think in countries where health care is free they would be using them?

  43. @jtking2504 You mean the supposed paper Dr.Ulrich Abel wrote that supposedly said chemo was of little benefit in treating cancer and that doctors themselves wouldn't take chemo?THAT PAPER? My God! I'm so sick and tired of you people dragging that old LIE out! Google: WordPress The Paper that Never Was"

    And now you can stop spreading this kind of misinformation because these statements were NEVER made by Dr.Ulrich. Who by the way wasn't a M.D. or clinician (treats patients)

  44. @SkepticalAaron THANK YOU! Thank you for pointing out the real facts regarding this often repeated lie..Although I'm sure these cranks will continue to spread the distorted version because it better suits their purposes. The real truth be dammed. It's so frustrating to see this lie repeated over and over by the alt. med. crowd.

    Maybe the person who's on the fence and not made up their mind can be reached. 🙂

  45. @Hyrshau The REAL truth about what Burzynski has been up to for the last 30 year is coming out,The never ending "TRIALS" that he charges the patients thousands and thousands to take part in. NO peer reviewed studies of ANY of his trials. NO ONE else has been able to replicate his results.Gives patients CHEMO and lots of it along with his antineoplastine therapy (and doesn't tell them they are getting chemo too) The list is LONG.It's all out there on the web. cont.

  46. @Hyrshau cont. His movie isn't a documentary it's an informercial. No reputable institution CHARGES patients to be in a research study. Burzynski does, and he charges alot.He reported his income to be 40 million dollars between a 5 year period. He's running a scam and it will all come crashing down this April 2012.Don't be fooled by the people he has waving placards saying he cured them. The man belongs in jail. And I'm quite sure he's headed there.+

  47. @800mEric This study you refer to was done in a lab on MICE and only cancerous brain cells.It's a GRAND CANYON leap to applying this in HUMAN BEINGS! This is the problem when lay people and people who just want to PROVE their point get a hold of some study.The next thing you know "It's the Cure For Cancer"BTW none of the journals this was published in are very impressive.Like comparing the Wall Street Journal to The National Enquier.

  48. @ArtypNk I feel your frustration! I've pointed out the same thing many times and get the same response. No one has ever been able to explain to me why if there are all these CHEAP, NATURAL, CURES that work out there, then why don't the countries that have FREE health care jump all over that! If they don't have a profit incentive why wouldn't they be using them? I just hear crickets chriping.

  49. @sweetclaire06 My point is the THC still has effect on the cancerous brain cells. That's why I was referring to that to explain how it would have an effect on cancer.

  50. @jtking2504 As I read your exchanges with @fcdog555 I can't help wonder if lets say YOU got testicular cancer( highly treatable) even in later stages, think Lance Armstrong, you would refuse it? And a child who is diagnosed today with leukemia and gets chemo has a 80-85% cure. You would say NO to that too? Does chemo cure all CA. NO! In some types it's not effective, but for some it is,It's the best thing we have at this time.But new types that work in different ways are the future

  51. @xinecallaw NO they are NOT trying to make organic foods, vitamins, supplements etc. illegal. What they ARE trying to put a stop to are the outlandish,unproven,unsafe claims that are made by the sellers of these products.These products represent a more than 6 billion year industry and the companies are owned by many of the same big evil Pharma companies that you rail against. Hardly a mom and pop business.Why do the vitamin, supp, etc.fight harder than any others against regulation?

  52. @sweetclaire06, ABSOLUTELY I would refuse it! Restoring health isn't complicated. I do not believe chemo is the 'best thing', it is simply profit making, that's my opinion. I have seen no evidence that it 'cures' anything, it just shrinks a tumor or masks a symptom to come back later while ignoring causes -thats good 4 profit. To cure disease an wholistic approach is needed & allows body to heal. a. Build up immune system, or b. destroy with toxic poison, I choose a. 🙂

  53. @jtking2504"I have seen no evidence that it 'cures' anything, it just shrinks a tumor or masks a symptom to come back later"

    You've seen no evidence?LOL!!!The med.journals are filled with documented cases of people being treated and the cancer never returned.They then go on to die of something 60yrs later completely unrelated to the cancer they once had.Some cancers respond VERY well to chemo, others don't.You are free as a bird to refuse chemo if you were to get testicular ca cont.

  54. @jtking2504 cont. but you would most likely end up dying from a type of cancer that is very treatable with chemo. Not all kinds of chemo come with the awful side effects people think of.Some aren't bad at all, and people continue to work etc.

  55. @Kristianmbossow"There is a cure for everything nature is providing for us"

    I'm currently watching a person I know die from leukemia because he refused conventional medicine (chemo).Instead he tried every kind of alternative medicine from MMS,hydrogen peroxide,detoxing,special diets of all kinds, Gerson therapy,oxygen therapy, vitamins,supplements,Reike, he even flew in personal healing guru from India.I'm sure I've forgotten a few.NONE of this b.s. worked! Now it's too late.

  56. @sweetclaire06, sorry, but that does not constitute evidence. Cancer Council research has shown the links with diet, alcohol, smoking, obesity etc. Healthy lifestyle offers enormous protection, it just isn't as complicated as you want it to be. If lifestyle caused it, lifestyle can cure it, whether you like it or not. Some cant get past the idea that drugs cure all. I have seen too much to ever agree with you so I'll leave it at that, you take whatever toxic chemo you like.

  57. @FAKEPAIN I've been reading your posts on alternative medicine.You keep saying there are better more effective cures / treatments for cancer out there than traditional chemotherapy. Can you give me even one example of a scientifically tested and proven alternative therapy for treating cancer? Just one would do. And anecdotal evidence isn't proof. Thanks

  58. @jonman701 "Drugs are a huge scam, if you find the correct natural treatment your body can heal itself, the leading cause of death is drugs, leading cause of disease is drugs."

    Where did you get this? The leading cause of death is drugs? Leading cause of disease if drugs? What are you smoking? You need to get your facts straight, instead of just making up bull shit.

  59. @sweetclaire06 Hey sweetclaire06 🙂 whos authority on deciding what is proof or not? you are for yourself and i am for me. I would suggest you take a deep deep look into for instance… the gerson therapy… call them up, hear their story, mail them, ask questions, ask for their records, read the book of Max gerson's 50 case studies of cancer, The proven nutritional therapy for curing cancer and degenerative, chronicle disease. Give it your sincere attention and I hope it'll be worth your time

  60. For a Video compilation of a number of different alternative cancer cures. Go to hub and read the article called… Could We Already Have "THE Cure for Cancer"?

  61. @FAKEPAIN Regarding the Gerson therapy: Charlotte Gerson claims that treatment at the clinic has produced high cure rates for many cancers. In 1986, however, investigators learned that patients were not monitored after they left the facility [19]. Although clinic personnel later said they would follow their patients systematically, there is no published evidence that they have done so. cont.

  62. @FAKEPAIN cont. A naturopath who visited the Gerson Clinic in 1983 was able to track 21 patients over a 5-year period (or until death) through annual letters or phone calls. At the 5-year mark, only one was still alive (but not cancer-free); the rest had succumbed to their cancer As for the 50 cases he writes about in his book.The details as to how they were even diagnosed is sorely missing.It reads like testimonials.No careful detailed records were ever kept.

  63. I'm with you on this one TYT. However.You guys should look into Rick Sampson's Cancer Cure. I'll say no more.—Also, another very interesting story is Bob Beck's Electrification Of The Blood. Beck stated that he was followed, threatened, and beaten up by representatives of various Big Pharma groups. Extremely interesting stuff. Beck is dead now, but there are videos up here of him lecturing. Check him out. Seriously.

  64. Regardless of weather natural cures work or not, it is irrational to say "THEY'RE ALL BAD BECAUSE THEY TAKE AWAY FROM TRADITIONAL MEDICINE".

    Eating a flax seed is not any more "bad" than a cancer patient, say, eating healthy in general, or getting enough sleep. As for the "it takes time away from traditional treatments", I've had people in my family with cancer and they end up spending most their time laying there watching TV

    How would eating a flax seed "hurt" the chemotherapy progress?

  65. I'm not necessarily saying that they "work". But as long as its not something that has any side effects, I don't see why you should fight a "war" against it.

    Especially when the logic used by mainstream medicine is about the same logic as "buying a car will make your truck stop working" or "inviting a Swede to your house will destroy the melatonin in your skin"

  66. And, how many times must I say to you ignorants, USING NATURAL MEDICINE IS NOT "DENYING CHEMOTHERAPY" ANY MORE THAN BUYING A CAR IS "DENYING" TRUCKS EXIST. You can own a car and a truck at the same time. Therefore, you can use chemotherapy and natural medicine at the same time.

  67. Did you even read my comment, let alone watch the video?
    You can try all the dumbass natural remedies you like; you can even try homeopathy for all I care, just carry on using real medicine if you have cancer.

  68. The Gerson method has been proven to NOT work.

    Google: " Dr Max Gerson and his Fifty cases (How sincere practitioners Can get it wrong)"

    Google: "wwwDOTcam-cancerDOTorg/CAM-Summaries/Dietary-approaches/Gerson-therapy/Does-it-work

  69. Max Gerson thought ALL cancer was caused by "toxins" in the body, Of course these TOXINS were never identified. And it's been proven there are different causes of cancer.

  70. Because of evil Big Pharma, and science based medicine a person diagnosed with cancer today in 2012 has an overall chance of 68% of being successfully treated.Individual types of cancer some have much higher 95% and some like lung & Pancreatic are much lower.

    Read: New England Journal of Medicine June7, 2012 Two Hundred Years of Cancer Research"

  71. I don't believe it's irrational at all to believe alternative treatments are bad IF the patient rejects proven traditional medicine and turns only to alt, med, treatment.

    I don't think I've EVER said that diet and lifestyle choices WEREN'T important. Of course there is nothing wrong IMO if a person tires different dietary supplements in conjunction with SB treatment.Some supplements have been proven to improve and make tolerating treatment better

    Flax seed is a excellent preventative of cancer

  72. I'm NOT waging a war against harmless treatments that don't have any side effects!

    I'm against the claiming that different Alternative TO medicine treatments will cure cancer.There are charlatans out there claiming that everything from drinking hydrogen peroxide,& chlorine dioxide,magnetic Zappers,juicing,raw diets,alkalizing diets,oxygen therapy, ozone therapy, colloidal silver, hemp oil,black salve,and on and on WILL CURE YOUR CANCER! The list is endless AND USELESS! This is what I'm against,

  73. You seem to be missing a very important point in all of this. The snake oil salesmen and charlatans who are claiming they can cure your cancer with these useless quack treatments don't tell the patient "Oh!use MY cure but also keep taking your mainstream treatment".No! What they tell the desperate sick person is "MY treatment will cure you! And you should not take traditional treatment".

  74. "You can try all the dumbass natural remedies you like; you can even try homeopathy for all I care, just carry on using real medicine if you have cancer"

    I was trying to make the same point to him.He doesn't seem to grasp it. Some people seem to be fact resistant.

  75. I get that. However…they DO sell "tobacco pipes" do that not? And most of them are NOT used for tobacco. The snake oil itself is not the problem then. Its the approach that denies traditional medicine, by the snake oil salesman.

  76. No, you really can't use natural remedies while pursing poisonous chemo/rads. I tried both…the poisons cancel out the majority of the positive effects of the natural rems. All or nothing! I did chemo/rads for 3 years….it did nothing but make me sicker…on natural rems for 1 year…I am cancer free. Stage 4 breast cancer…mets to lungs, brain, liver, and bones.

  77. How many peoples lives have been totally buggered by stupid Chemotherapy…….and sometimes the natural Therapies people were still able to intervene and still save them to extend their lives even after all that B.S. think Astragalus the Chinese herb that thrashes so many Influenza Virus like Over!!
    Enjoy your day people……I the mere Mortal

  78. So here we are in our Country and all the stupid idiots are dealing with the latest influenza ( that was so mild you could hardly take it seriously)and yes you guessed the stupid tards killed more people yet again and I had that the Influenza and thrashed that with wait for this I kid u Not…………this is how simple it was Crumbed Fish!! which affects the white blood cells count …… ridiculous? well that was basically all I did and thrashed it…….over…..while they treated that and killed people they are such Idiots……you can hardly comprehend it!!

  79. You're an ignorant fool. Cancer has been curable for over 100 years and with 100% organic foods and vitamins. Get a clue. The only thing you're doing here is promoting pharmaceutical murder. How do you sleep at night?

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *